Why Did My Dad Trust His New Girlfriend Instead of Taking Me to the Hospital?
A prosecutor in the neighboring county opened an investigation into whether Vanessa could be charged with practicing medicine without a license. Dad’s lawyer tried to use these revelations to show that Dad had been manipulated by a predatory individual.
The hospital social work department connected me with a therapist named Dr. Nina Fitzgerald who specialized in medical trauma and family conflict. She explained that what I was experiencing was complex trauma because it involved betrayal by someone who should have protected me.
She asked if I wanted to do family therapy sessions with Dad and I said I wasn’t ready yet. She gave me permission to be angry, to grieve, to feel whatever I felt without pressure to forgive or move on.
Mom flew in from Oregon where she’d moved after the divorce 5 years earlier. She walked into my hospital room and immediately started crying, apologizing for not being there when it happened.
I told her that none of this was her fault. She sat with me for hours while I told her the whole story from beginning to end and I watched her expression cycle through shock, disbelief, fury, and grief.
She said she was filing an emergency custody modification based on Dad’s demonstrated inability to make appropriate decisions. The thought of leaving my school and friends felt like another loss, but staying with Dad after what he’d done felt impossible.
Mom met with Dennis Kowalski and made it clear that she wouldn’t be satisfied with parenting classes and monitoring. She said Dad needed to face real consequences for nearly killing me.
The genetic testing revealed that I’d inherited the Marfan syndrome gene from Dad, which meant he had the condition too. Dr. Kumar explained that Dad needed to be evaluated by a cardiologist immediately.
The irony that Dad had an undiagnosed genetic condition that could kill him, just like it had nearly killed me, felt like cosmic justice. Autumn also needed to be tested to determine if she’d inherited the gene.
The genetic counselor explained that Marfan syndrome was autosomal dominant, meaning each of Dad’s children had a 50% chance of inheriting the condition. I was discharged from the hospital after 17 days with a medication list that filled an entire page.
Mom had rented an apartment near the hospital so I could attend follow-up appointments and cardiac rehab sessions. Dad tried to argue about the custody arrangement, but his lawyer quietly advised him that fighting it would look terrible.
Autumn came to stay with us immediately, telling Dad she didn’t feel safe living with someone who’d ignored a medical emergency. Watching my 14-year-old sister have to choose between her parents because Dad had demonstrated such catastrophically poor judgment felt like another crime.
Criminal case against Dad moved forward despite Dennis Kowalski’s best efforts. The prosecutor charged him with reckless endangerment of a child, arguing that his decision to delay appropriate care for 90 minutes constituted criminal negligence.
The preliminary hearing resulted in the case being bound over for trial with the judge noting that there was sufficient evidence for a jury to find that Dad’s actions had endangered my life. Vanessa was charged separately with practicing medicine without a license.
Autumn’s genetic testing came back positive for Marfan syndrome which meant she needed to start regular cardiac monitoring. The cardiologist put her on beta blockers and told her she couldn’t participate in high-intensity sports, which devastated her.
Dad’s own cardiac evaluation revealed moderate aortic dilation that would require surgery within the next few years. My case became a cautionary tale taught in emergency medicine and medical ethics courses.
The professor reached out to ask if she could interview me for a follow-up piece and after discussing it with Mom and Dr. Fitzgerald I agreed. Dad’s trial began 4 months after my dissection and I had to testify about what happened that day.
I walked through the timeline for the prosecution, from the chest pain during warm-ups to the 90 minutes of worsening symptoms before Autumn finally called 911. I told them about feeling like my chest was tearing apart from the inside and about watching my father weigh the cost of an ambulance against my life.
The jury looked horrified and I could see several of them glancing at Dad with expressions that ranged from anger to disbelief. Dennis Kowalski cross-examined me, trying to establish that I’d seemed anxious and that Dad had reasonable grounds to believe Vanessa’s assessment.
I answered honestly that I’d never experienced anything remotely like the pain of an aortic dissection and that I’d clearly communicated how different and severe this was. The cross-examination felt like being forced to defend the legitimacy of my own suffering.
The paramedics testified about finding me unconscious on the couch with critically low blood pressure. Dr. Kumar testified about the extensive aortic dissection and the permanent limitations I’d face for the rest of my life.
The prosecution built a comprehensive case that Dad had ignored multiple red flags and trusted the opinion of an unqualified person over clear evidence of a medical emergency. The defense called Vanessa as a witness, and she testified that she’d genuinely believed I was having a panic attack.
Under cross-examination, the prosecutor forced her to admit that she’d only completed one semester of nursing school and that she’d failed her anatomy and physiology course. Vanessa became defensive and argumentative, insisting that she’d been trying to help.
Dad took the stand in his own defense and tried to explain his decision-making. He described feeling torn between different sources of advice and genuinely not understanding how serious the situation was until it was too late.
The prosecutor asked Dad why he’d trusted Vanessa over Coach Ramsay and over me, his own son. Dad couldn’t provide a satisfactory answer beyond saying he’d made a terrible mistake in judgment.
The final question was devastating in its simplicity. If you had to make the same decision today with the knowledge that your son nearly died and will be disabled for life because of that 90-minute delay, would you make the same choice?
